This review petition is filed by respondents 2 and 3 in the aforespecified writ petition, seeking to review the judgment dated 18.11.2016 to a limited extent of the direction issued by this court that, the collection charges on the basis of revenue recovery action will be entitled to be avoided by the petitioners in accordance with law, apparently relying on the judgment of this court in Deputy Tahsildar (RR) v. Vijaya Builders [2016(1) KLT 684]. However, according to the review petitioners, in the judgment of a Division Bench of this court rendered on 21.1.2016 in Deputy Collector and others v. Appu Jose [ILR 2017 (1) Kerala 511], this court had occasion to consider the issue in respect of imposing collection charges after the amendment, by introducing rule 5 (3) to the Kerala Revenue Recovery Rules, 1968 and held that, 1% collection charges of the total amount can be imposed on