Review petition filed regarding non-occupation of a railway stall after tender finalization. Court clarified petitioner's right to continue business until the new tenderer takes over.
Clarification granted: Petitioner permitted to continue business till new tenderer occupies the shop.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2017/17TH PHALGUNA, 1938
RP.No. 211 of 2017
------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 5628/2017 DATED 22/02/2017) -------------------------
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SRI.ANANTHASAYANAM.K., AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.LATE MR.KASI VISWANATHAN, KASINATH, 18/167/1, CALVARY ROAD, POOTHOLE, THRISSUR-680 104.
BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL S.RAJ SMT.K.N.RAJANI SRI.RADHIKA RAJASEKHARAN P. SMT.ANILA PETER SRI.S.SUDHEESH
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
1. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CHENNAI DIVISION, CHENNAI-3
2. THE SR. DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, COMMERCIAL BRANCH, TRIVANDRUM-14.
3. SRI.NISHAD,
R1 & R2 BY SRI.C.S.DIAS,SC, RAILWAYS
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-03-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
Review Petition No. 211 of 2017 in W.P.(C) No.5628 of 2017
----------------------------------------------Dated this the 8th day of March, 2017
ORDER
The writ petition was disposed of on 22.2.2017 directing
the respondents to permit the petitioner to operate the stall No.TVC/046 on platform No.2/3 at Thrissur Junction Railway Station till such time the tenders are finalized. Now this review petition is filed by the petitioner stating that since the tender proceedings are finalised, respondents are not permitting the petitioner to occupy the shop.
tenderer occupies the shop, the petitioner shall be permitted to continue the business.
Review petition is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
smv 08.03.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to continue the business at the shop till the new tenderer occupies it.
Ananthasayanam.K.
The Divisional Railway Manager, Chennai
The Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager, Trivandrum
Nishad
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
