Dismissed
A.Subair v. the Tahsildar, Kottarakkara
Kerala HCRP/1000/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/25TH KARTHIKA, 1939
R.P.No.1000 of 2017 IN W.P(C).No.23162/2017 -U
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C)No.23162/2017 DATED 18-09-2017 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:-
A.SUBAIR, T.C.39/1376, KACHERI VEEDU, CHALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, (PARTY-IN-PERSON)
BY SRI.A.SUBAIR (PARTY IN PERSON).
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:-
1. THE TAHSILDAR, KOTTARAKKARA.
2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHITHARA VILLAGE OFFICE, CHITHARA , KOLLAM - 691559.
R1 & R2 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-11-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K. Vinod Chandran, J
---------------------------------------------------------------------R.P.No.1000 of 2017 in W.P.(C) No.23162 of 2017-U
Dated, this the 16th day of November, 2017
ORDER
The above review petition has been filed seeking a
re-hearing of the matter, as the grounds reveal. The only ground, which is of any significance as far as the review is concerned, was with respect to the report filed by the Tahsildar having not been received by the petitioner.
Review petition rejected.
Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
vku/-
[ true copy ]
A. Subair
The Tahsildar, Kottarakkara
The Village Officer, Chithara
K. Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court