Anie Varghese v. Shyni
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court directed the Principal Munsiff Court to expedite a partition suit where parties failed to initiate forensic examination of a disputed Will within a stipulated timeframe.
What did the court decide?
Directions to complete trial within three months of forensic report; documents compared within three months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE 2017/1ST ASHADHA, 1939
OP(C).No. 1825 of 2017 (O)
OS 3067/2014 of PRL.MUNSIFF COURT,THRISSUR.
PETITIONER(S):
ANIE VARGHESE, W/O. VARGHESE, AGED 67 YEARS, KAVUNDEN HOUSE, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR.
RESPONDENTS:
1. SHYNI, W/O. ANTU, CHAZHOOR PUZHAKKAL HOUSE, PERUMBILLISSERY, CHEVVUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001.
2. DEEPU, S/O. ANTU, CHAZHOOR PUZHAKKAL HOUSE, PERUMBILLISSERY, CHEVVUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Principal Munsiff Court was directed to expedite the partition suit.
Whether the Trial Court was mandated to arrange for forensic comparison of the disputed Will.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anie Varghese
- respondent
Shyny
- respondent
Deepu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court