This matrimonial appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and lack of instructions to her counsel.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2017/15TH PHALGUNA, 1938
Mat.Appeal.No. 64 of 2006 ( )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 594/2003 of FAMILY COURT, KANNUR DATED 29-07-2005
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
ELIZABETH REETHA, D/O. YESUDASAN, AGED 38 YARS, ASSISTANT TEACHER, K.G. SCHOOL,, DSC CENTRE, PARNASSERY, KANNUR CONTONMENT,, KANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, RESIDING AT, MELE CHOVVA, KANNUR.
BY ADV. SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER::
P.S. SANTHOSH, S/O. P.K.SREEDHARAN, AGED 32 YEARS, AL AMEEN HOSTEL,KANNUR MUNICIPALITY, KANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT, DEVIKRIPA, PUNNOL, THALASSERY.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH NAMBIAR
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 0603-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J &
**K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** Mat.Appeal No.64 of 2016
Dated this the 6th day of March 2017
J U D G M E N T
Shaffique, J
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Counsel has no instruction in the matter. There is no appearance for the appellant as well. This Mat.Appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(sd/-)
(A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE)
(sd/-)
(K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE)
jsr
ELIZABETH REETHA
P.S. SANTHOSH
A.M.SHAFFIQUE
K.RAMAKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
