Disposed
Susan Britto & Others v. Sosamma Joseph
Kerala HCCRP/450/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017/2ND PHALGUNA, 1938
CRP.No.450 of 2010 (E)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS.NO.1530/2008 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 09-04-2010
REVISION PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS:
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.SREEKUMAR SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
SOSAMMA JOSEPH,D/O.V.JOHN, 'CARMELYN, T.C.NO.12/69, ALAMOODU, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TEMPORARILY RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.7, CHEMPAKA,SAPHALAYAM NAGAR, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTOM.P.O,TRIVANDRUM,PIN-695 004.
BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21.02.2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
I.A.NO.2147/2010 IN C.R.P.NO.450/2010
CLOSED
2 1/02/2017 SD/- P.SOMARAJAN, JUDGE
//TRUE COPY//
AHZ/
P.Somarajan, J.
C.R.P. No.450 of 2010 (E)
Dated this the 21st day of February, 2017
O R D E R
Today when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter was amicably settled in between the parties and a compromise petition signed by all the parties was filed. The compromise petition is accepted and the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of in accordance with the compromise. The compromise will form part of the order.
P. Somarajan Judge
ahz/
SUSAN BRITTO ET AL.
SOSAMMA JOSEPH
P.SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court