P.G.Babu v. K.K.Joseph
Case brief
What is this about?
In this civil revision, the Kerala High Court dismissed the petition filed under Section 115 of the CPC because it was not presented on two successive dates due to the petitioner's absence, citing non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition No. 430 of 2013 dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017/8TH MAGHA, 1938
CRP.No. 430 of 2013 (D)
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OS 272/2007 of ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, ALAPPUZHA DATED 07-06-2013
PETITIONER/2ND JUDGMENT DEBTOR: -
P.G.BABU, AGED 53 YEARS, PRESIDENT SNDP SAKHAYOGAM NO. 363, KAKKAZHAM, NEERKUNNAM, AMBALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.P.SHANES
RESPONDENTS/DECREEE HOLDER & JUDGMENT DEBTORS 1 & 3 AND ADDITIONAL 4TH JUDGMENT DEBTOR:
- K.K.JOSEPH, AGED 58 YEARS, KALLUPURACKAL, PUNNAPRA.P.O., ALAPPUZHA.
- SNDP SAKHAYOGUM NO. 363, KAKKAZHAM, NEERKUNNAM, ALAPPUZHA-688005, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain a civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of the CPC when the petitioner remains absent from the hearing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.G. Babu
- respondent
K.K. Joseph
- respondent
SNDP Sakhayogum No. 363
- respondent
Bhaskaran
- respondent
C.P. Augustine
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court