Amsulal P.B v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court quashed the FIR and proceedings against the accused as a matter of Inherent Power, noting the settlement between parties and the benefit to the minor victim.
What did the court decide?
The FIR and further proceedings against the petitioner in Crime No.977/2017 of Badagara Police Station are quashed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/18TH SRAVANA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 5413 of 2017 ()
CRIME NO. 977/2017 OF VATAGARA POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
AMSULAL P.B.,
AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.PONNARATH BALAKRISHNAN, PONNARA HOUSE, MEMUNDA PO, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.VENUGOPAL (1086/92)
RESPONDENT(S)/SATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682031.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the offences in a First Information Report involving a minor child should be quashed given the settlement between parties
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AMSULAL P.B.
- respondent
STATE REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
- respondent
SASEENDRAN
- respondent
GIRIJA M.P.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court