Dismissed

Dr.Abdul Missiah v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC8 Aug 2017Crl.MC/2113/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court declined to entertain a Criminal Misc. case for quashing proceedings or discharge in a warrant trial case, leaving the petitioner at liberty to approach the trial court under Section 239 Cr.P.C., while granting an exemption from personal appearance pending further orders.

What did the court decide?

Exemption granted from personal appearance before the trial court via application, except when presence is necessary.

Dr.Abdul Missiah Vs State of Kerala — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Kerala HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/17TH SRAVANA, 1939

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 2113 of 2014 ()

¶6

CC 24/2014 of J.M.F.C.,SULTHANBATHERY CRIME NO. 99/2012 OF MEENANGADI POLICE STATION , WAYANAD

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

¶8

DR.ABDUL MISSIAH

¶9

S/O.K.K.ALAVI, MARKKASSIL BISHARA, BISHARA MANZIL MANCHERI P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.PRAMOD J.DEV

¶11

RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT & STATE:

¶12

THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF

¶13

KERALA.

¶14

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE MEENANGADI POLICE STATION, MEENANGADI, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

¶15

LAISA REGHU, W/O.REGHU, AGED 56 YEARS NIRMALYAM HOUSE, NEAR GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, MEENANGADI P.O, WAYANAD DISTRICT - 673121.

¶16

R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI. C. K. PRASAD

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-082017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.

¶19

¶20

Crl.M.C.No.2113 of 2014

¶21

- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8^th day of August 2017

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

The petitioner is the accused in C.C. No.24 of 2014

¶24

on the files of the court below. The offences alleged are

¶25

the offences under Sections 341, 294(b) and 354 I.P.C.

¶26

The above case is a warrant trial case. Therefore,

¶27

the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise all his contentions and plead for discharge before the trial court under Section 239 Cr.P.C. For the said reason, I am not inclined to entertain this Crl.M.C.

¶28

Crl.M.C.No.2113/2014

¶29

: 2 :

¶30

In the result, this Crl.M.C. stands closed.

¶31

However, the petitioner shall be granted exemption

¶32

from his personal appearance before the court below on all posting dates except when his presence is necessary for the progress of the case, if the petitioner files application before the court below in this regard after his appearance in

¶33

person before the court below.

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, JUDGE

¶36

dl/8.7.2017

¶37

// True Copy //

¶38

PA to Judge

Dr.Abdul Missiah v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.Abdul Missiah v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shameer Babu Vs the State of Kerala

Subina Maria Vs the State of Kerala

Anilkumar Vs State of Kerala

Sreekumar Vs State of Kerala

Shaiju Vs the State of Kerala

Mohammed Afsal Vs State of Kerala