In contempt proceedings challenging non-compliance with a previous judgment, the court held that directives were complied with based on counsel's submission. The court closed the cases accordingly.
Contempt cases closed as directives were found to be complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1002 of 2017 (S) IN WP(C).38628/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 38628/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 14-12-2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
GEORGE MATHEW,
S/O MATHEW, 54 YEARS,EDAPAZHATHIL HOUSE, MANJALLOOR,VAZHAKKULAM.P.O,MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.M.JOSEPH
SRI.R.S.HARI KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5 IN W.P.(C):
1. SMT. TINKU BISWAL I.A.S, STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2. SMT.A.SHAINAMOL(IAS), KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695033.
3. SRI.V.S.PRADEEP, THE FINANCE MANAGER,KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695033.
4. SRI.P.GOPALAN, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER,KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
5. SRI.AJAYAKUMAR, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,PROJECT DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,KATTAPPANA,IDUKKI DISTRICT.
R2-R5 BY SRI.P.BENJAMIN PAUL, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.VINITHA B
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-12-2017, ALONG WITH COC. 1004/2017 AND COC. 1018/2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1002 of 2017 (S) IN WP(C).38628/2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)NO.38628/2016 DATED 14.12.2016 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
dlk
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O(C). Nos. 1002, 1004 & 1018 of 2017
Dated this the 4th day of December, 2017
JUDGMENT
These contempt cases are filed by the petitioner, who
is common in all the cases complaining that, the judgment
dated 14.12.2016 is not complied with.
Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for
the respondent submitted that, the directives are complied with, and therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the
contempt cases any further.
Contempt cases are closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
dlk/4/12/
George Mathew
Smt. Tinku Biswal
Smt. A. Shainamol
Sri. V. S. Pradeep
Sri. P. Gopalan
Sri. Ajayakumar
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
