Dismissed

Sreemandara Varma Jain v. B.S Tirumeni

Kerala HC24 Jul 2017Con.Case(C)/666/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court heard a contempt petition (C.O.(C) No.666 of 2017) seeking closure of a contempt case instituted against respondents in W.P.(C) No.28549 of 2015. Relying on affidavits from both sides confirming compliance with previous directions, the Court closed the contempt proceedings without issuing separate reasoning.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case No.666 of 2017 is closed.

Sreemandara Varma Jain Vs B.S Tirumeni — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶4

MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JULY 2017/2ND SRAVANA, 1939

¶5

Con.Case(C).No. 666 of 2017 (S)

¶6

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28549/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA

¶7

PETITIONER(S):

¶8

1 SREEMANDARA VARMA JAIN, S/O LATE M.P.SANTHI VARMA JAIN,AGED 49 YEARS, KALYANA MANDIRAM, MUTTIL NORTH VILLAGE, P.O. KALPETTA NORTH, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

¶9

2 SIDDHARTHA DEVI,

¶10

D/O LATE M.P.SANTHI VARMA JAIN,AGED 33 YEARS, KALYANA MANDIRAM, MUTTIL NORTH VILLAGE, P.O. KALPETTA NORTH, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

¶11

3 SUSHENA DEVI, D/O LATE M.P.SANTHI VARMA JAIN,AGED 44 YEARS, KALYANA MANDIRAM, MUTTIL NORTH VILLAGE, P.O. KALPETTA NORTH, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

¶12

4 PUSHPALATHA S. JAIN, W/O LATE M.P.SANTHI VARMA JAIN,AGED 67 YEARS, KALYANA MANDIRAM, MUTTIL NORTH VILLAGE, P.O. KALPETTA NORTH, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

¶13

BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN

¶14

RESPONDENT(S):

¶15

1 B.S. TIRUMENI, AGED AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WAYANAD-673121.

¶16

Con.Case(C).No. 666 of 2017 (S)

¶17

2 SANKARAN NAMBOODIRI, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, THE TAHASILDAR, KALPETTA, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673121.

¶18

3 REVATHI, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MUTTIL NORTH VILLAGE, WAYANAD-673121.

¶19

BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S.GOPINATHAN

¶20

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-07-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

¶22

Con.Case(C).No. 666 of 2017 (S)

¶23

APPENDIX

¶24

PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES

¶25

A1 A TRUE COPY OF COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS IN WPC.28549/2015

¶26

A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED JANUARY 21, 2016 IN WPC.28549/2015 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT

¶27

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURE

NIL

TRUE COPY

P.S. TO JUDGE

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

¶33

**********************************************************************

¶34

C.O.(C) No.666 of 2017

¶35

**********************************************************************

¶36

Dated this the 24^th day of July, 2017

¶37

JUDGMENT

¶38

Both sides submit that the directions in the judgment in

¶39

W.P.(C) No.28549 of 2015 dated 21.1.2016, have been complied

¶40

with. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.

¶41

Sd/-

¶42

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE

¶43

¶44

/True copy/

¶45

P.A. to Judge

Sreemandara Varma Jain v. B.S Tirumeni

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sreemandara Varma Jain v. B.S Tirumeni

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Musthafa Vs the District Collector

C.Usman Vs the Sub Divisional Magistrate

Siraj Khanna Vs the Sub Inspector of Police & Others

Nazar.S Vs University of Kerala

Biju Jacob Vs Mr.Binu V.V.

Joshitha K.S. Vs Swapna R.