Ranjan v. Anil Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The court accepted the petitioner's submission that the impugned judgment dated 08.08.2016 was complied with and ordered the contempt of court case to be closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of court case ordered to be closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/20TH POUSHA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 2271 of 2016 (S)
----------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 25894/2016 & 26071/2016 DATED 08-08-2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS IN WPC.:
1. RANJAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.GOVINDAN, KAMBILY THUNDIL, MARAD (P.O), ERNAKULAM (DIST).
2. GIRIJA,
- AGED 59 YEARS, W/O.MAHESHAN, ERUMASSERY HOUSE, MARAD, MARAD (P.O)
BY ADV. SRI.B.BALA PRASANNAN
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ranjan
- respondent
Anil Kumar
Coram
K.Vinod Chandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court