Disposed
Sanalkumar M.S. v. Joshy Paul Veliyath
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1822/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/19TH POUSHA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1822 of 2016 (S)
---------------------------WP(C) 32111/2015 DATED 27-07-2016 ------------------
PETITIONER/4TH PETITIONERS IN WPC : -----------------------------------
SANALKUMAR M.S,
AGED 60 YEARS, S/O. LATE SREEDHARAN NAIR, SPECIAL GRADE ASSISTANT, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES (K.S.F.E.) LTD, THEKKEKKARA BRANCH, MANCOMPU P.O, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.N.RAGHURAJ
RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT IN WPC : ----------------------------------
JOSHY PAUL VELIYATH, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES (KSFE) LTD, HEAD OFFICE: BHADRATHA, MUSEUM ROAD, THRISSUR-680 020. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.P.GOPINATH SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN SRI.KURYAN THOMAS
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-01-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.V.
COC NO 1822 OF 2016:
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES:
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
K.V.
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1822 of 2016 (S)
Dated: 9th January, 2017
J U D G M E N T
The contempt case is closed, leaving open the contentions if any to be agitated in appropriate
proceedings.
Sd/K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
jjj 9/1/17
Sanalkumar M.S
Joshy Paul Veliyath
K.Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court