Suneesh Babu v. Simi, Environmental Engineer
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, the petitioner alleged the respondent Pollution Control Board was guilty of refusing integrated consent despite modification directions. The court found no reason to initiate contempt proceedings as the officers acted on new circular setback requirements, thus closing the case.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/26TH KARTHIKA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 2030 of 2017 (S)
WP(C) 3416/2017 of THIS HON'BLE COURT
PETITIONER :
SUNEESH BABU, S/O. DIVAKARAN, AGED 47 YEARS, KOCHAYYATH HOUSE, PADA NORTH, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN
RESPONDENT :
SIMI, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, DISTRICT OFFICE, POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 001.
BY SRI. T.NAVEEN SC,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should be initiated against the respondent officers who revoked consent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUNEESH BABU
- respondent
SIMI
Coram
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court