Devaki v. Sri. Sasikumar, Forest Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner submitted that the direction issued by the Court was complied with. Held: The contempt case is thus closed. No elaborate judgment was delivered.
The petitioner submitted that the direction issued by the Court was complied with. Held: The contempt case is thus closed. No elaborate judgment was delivered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/25TH JYAISHTA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 129 of 2017 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 17833/2016 DATED 07-06-2016
-----------
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
DEVAKI, W/O.PAZHANANKUTTY, AGED 64 YEARS, KOTHODUKALAM, VEMBALLOOR P.O., THENKURISSI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA
RESPONDENT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT IN WP(C):
SRI. SASIKUMAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, NENMARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 508.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI S.KANNAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.V.
COC 129 OF 2017:
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES:
A1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WRIT PETITION 17833/2016 DATED 7/6/2016.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.S.TO JUDGE
K.V.
P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
Contempt Case (Civil) No.129 of 2017
Dated this the 15th day of June, 2017
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioner that the direction issued by this Court has been complied with. In the light of the said submission, this Contempt Case is closed.
Sd/P.B. SURESH KUMAR JUDGE
rsr
Devaki
Sri. Sasikumar
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court