Mammen Varghese v. Amit Meena
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court proceeding, the Court noted considerable delay in complying with earlier directions but, accepting that compliance occurred on 7.2.2017, closed the case without further proceedings.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017/27TH MAGHA, 1938 Con.Case(C).No. 1167 of 2016 (S) ------------------------------
OP 8705/2002 DATED 10-03-2016 ------------------
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 & 5:
1. MAMMEN VARGHESE, S/O. THOMAS VARGHESE, AGED 59 YEARS, SHOP NO. 41/1717E, COCHIN CORPORATION SHOPPING COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM NORTH, KOCHI-682 018. 2. JAYA PANICKER, W/O. PANICKER M.S., AGED 61 YEARS, SHOP NO. 41/171D, COCHIN CORPORATION SHOPPING COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM NORTH, KOCHI-682 018.
3. NADEERA SIDHIQUE, W/O. SADHIQUE, AGED 58 YEARS, SHOP NO. 41/1717B, COCHIN CORPORATION SHOPPING COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM NORTH, KOCHI-682018. 4. T.J WILLIAMS, S/O. T. J. GOACHIN, AGED 69 YEARS, SHOP NO. 41/1717G(1), COCHIN CORPORATION SHOPPING COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM NORTH, KOCHI-682018.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.P.SUDHEER SRI.ARUN MATHEW VADAKKAN
RESPONDENT(S):
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mammen Varghese
- petitioner
Jaya Panicker
- petitioner
Nadeer Siddique
- petitioner
T.J Williams
- respondent
Amit Meena
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court