K.Jyothishkumar v. U.v.Jose
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed a contempt of court petition filed against the respondent for non-compliance of a direction issued in an earlier writ judgment, after being satisfied that the direction had been complied with.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue action against the order passed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2017/30TH ASHADHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1067 of 2017 (S)
---------------------------------------------THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 30169/2016 DATED 10-01-2017.
PETITIONER(S):
K. JYOTISHKUMAR, AGED 76 YEARS, S/O.K. RAGHAVAN, RESIDING AT KANANGOTT HOUSE, PANNIYANKARA, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN, SRI.P.A.HARISH.
RESPONDENT(S):
U.V. JOSE, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, P.O. CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE-673 020.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Jyothishkumar
- respondent
U.V. Jose
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court