Bail application of an accused person was admitted in ernakulam highest court on nov 3 2017. The court closed the matter after the petitioner's counsel expressed lack of interest in pursuing the application, leaving the order without a substantive decision on the bail suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/12TH KARTHIKA, 1939
Bail Appl..No. 5656 of 2017 ()
CRIME NO. 598/2017 OF ERNAKULAM CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
RATHEESH AGED 31 YEARS, S/O. MADHAVAN PILLAI, POYKAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, CHIKKA, EDAVATTOM, CHATHANNUR, KOLLAM
BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KEERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031
2. THE SUB INSPECTOR
R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. MAYA M.N.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-11-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
SCL.
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, J.
B.A. No.5656 of 2017
Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2017
ORDER
When the matter came up, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is not interested in prosecuting this bail application. Recording the said submission, this application is closed.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN JUDGE
Scl/03.11.2017
True Copy
PA to Judge
Ratheesh
State of Kerala represented by the Public Prosecutor
Raja Vijayaraghavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
