The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed an application for anticipatory bail to the first accused in a criminal case. The court found no change of circumstances following the refusal of a prior pre-arrest bail application to grant the reliefs sought.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2017/20TH ASHADHA, 1939
Bail Appl..No. 4451 of 2017 ()
CRIME NO.335/2017 OF NOORANADU POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA.
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:
FAIZAL A., AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL RASHEED, KAITHAKOTTU PADINJAREKARA, AADIKKATTUKULANGARA,NOORANAD, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN SMT.S.INDU
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.R.DHANIL
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-07-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., J
B.A. No.4451 of 2017
Dated this the 11th day of July, 2017
ORDER
BA 4451/2017
2
submit that the investigation is still pending and the petitioner had absconded.
This application is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., JUDGE
vps 11.7.17
/True Copy/
PS to Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the first accused in Crime No. 335 of 2017 after earlier refusal of pre-arrest bail.
Faizal A.
The State of Kerala
Raja Vijayaraghavan V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
