A settlement agreement was signed between the parties during the hearing of the appeal. The court dismissed the appeal suit and ordered the refund of the court fee to the appellant.
Appeal suit dismissed; terms of mediated settlement agreement made part of decree; court fee refunded to appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2017/2ND ASHADHA, 1939
AS.No. 456 of 2000 (B)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 135/1996 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, KOCHI DATED 30-09-1999
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
TATA TEA LTD., WILLINGDON ISLAND, COCHIN 3.
BY ADVS.SRI.JOSEPH MARKOSE (SR.) SRI.A.KUMAR
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.DINESH RAO
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V. CHITAMBARESH & SATHISH NINAN, JJ.
A.S. NO. 456 OF 2000
Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2017
JUDGMENT
Chitambaresh, J.
The counsel representing the parties have signed the mediated settlement agreement. The appeal suit is disposed of in accordance therewith. The terms of the settlement shall form part of the decree.
The court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal shall be refunded to the appellant.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE
SATHISH NINAN JUDGE
ncd
TATA TEA LTD.
M/S. JINDAL AROMATICS & ANS.
V. CHITAMBARESH
SATHISH NINAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
