Southern Railway v. K.M.Musthafa
Case brief
What is this about?
This arbitration appeal disposed of the pending matter by directing the court to decide the underlying operating procedure within one month.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Additional District Judge to dispose of O.P.(Arb.) No.128 of 2017 within one month.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/7TH ASHADHA, 1939
Arb.A.No. 41 of 2017 ()
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 13.6.2017 IN I.A NO.1758/2017 IN O.P(ARB.) NO.128/2017 OF DISTRICT COURT-I, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. SOUTHERN RAILWAY, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER, HEAD QUARTERS OFFICE,COMMERCIAL BRANCH, PASSENGER SERVICE AND CATERING,SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CHENNAI.
2. SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.C.S.DIAS,SC, RAILWAYS
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Southern Railway
- respondent
K.M. Musthafa
Coram
V. Chitambaresh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court