Sivaraman v. Prabhakaran
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/16TH BHADRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 9976 of 2009 (O)
OS 64/2001 OF MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, PATTAMBI.
PETITIONER:
SIVARAMAN, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.THEKKEMANNENGODEPADI LATE KUNHADI, VADANAMKURUSSI AMSOM AND DESOM IN OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI
SRI.R.SREEHARI
RESPONDENT:
PRABHAKARAN, AGED 61, S/O.KALLIDUMBIL LATE KRISHNAN, VADANAMKURUSSI AMSOM AND DESOM IN OTTAPALAM TALUK.
BY ADVS. SRI.C.DILIP
SRI.P.K.MOHANAN(PALAKKAD)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-09-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
W.P.(C).No.9976 of 2009
Dated this the 7th day of September, 2016.
JUDGMENT
When the writ petition came up for hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the petition has become infructuous. The above submission is recorded and the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.
/true copy/
P.S to Judge
cl
SIVARAMAN
PRABHAKARAN
K. RAMAKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court