A.N. Mohanan v. T. a. Mini
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/16TH BHADRA, 1938
OP(C).No. 1861 of 2016 (O)
E.P.NO. 341/2005 IN O.S.NO. 433/1997 OF SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT/1ST DEFENDANT :
A.N. MOHANAN,
AGED 51 YEARS, SON OF LATE NARAYANAN, ALAZHATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, KOCHI 20, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR
SRI.S.GANESH SRI.SYAM KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/ PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS 2 TO 6 :
1. T. A.MINI, AGED 39 YEARS, D/O. T.K.APPU, THATTASSERIL HOUSE, PERUMANNOOR DESOM, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, KOCHI 36, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
2. A.N.VIDYASAGAR, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANAN, ALAZHATH HOUSE, KADAVANTHRA P.O, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, KOCHI 36, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
3. A.N.PRAMEELA, AGED 43 YEARS, W/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN, THEKKADATHU HOUSE, ELAMKUNNAPPUZHA P.O, VYPEEN, KOCHI TALUK.
4. A.N.SATHI, AGED 53 YEARS, W/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN, PATHANIPADOM HOUSE, AMBELIPADOM ROAD, VYTTILA P.O, KOCHI 682 019, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
..2/-
..2..
OP(C).No. 1861 of 2016 (O)
5. A.N.VINAYAVATHI, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN, KALATHIL HOUSE, NAYARAMBALM P.O, VYPEEN, KOCHI TALUK.
6. A.N.JALAJA, AGED 45 YEARS, W/O. MOHANAN, THAKARAKANDATHIL HOUSE, PERUVA P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
R1 BY SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN (SENIOR ADVOCATE) ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN R2 & R3 BY ADVS. SMT.K.M.SUNU SMT.ANN MALU ALBI R4 TO R6 BY ADVS. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE SMT.ACHU SUBHA ABRAHAM SMT.K.R.MONISHA
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-09-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
O.P.(C) No.1861 of 2016
Dated this the 7th day of September, 2016
JUDGMENT
When this petition came up for hearing today, the counsel for the
first respondent submitted that the Special Leave Petition filed by some of the respondents has been dismissed by the Apex Court on 05.09.2016 and this fact was conceded by the counsel for the petitioner also. So in view of the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition filed by the parties against the order passed by the court below, nothing survives in this petition. So the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- (K. Ramakrishnan, Judge)
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
ss
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Supreme Court, 05.09.2016Referred
A.N. Mohanan
T. A. Mini
A.N. Vidyasagar
A.N. Prameela
A.N. Sathi
A.N. Vinayavathi
K.Ramakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court