Petitioner sought direction to 1st respondent to consider her petition filed on 17.02.2016. Court directed respondent to consider petition within four months after affording hearing opportunity.
Direction to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's petition and take appropriate action within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/25TH PHALGUNA, 1937
WP(C).No. 9929 of 2016 (M)
PETITIONER(S):
P.K.JISHA, AGED 34 YEARS WIFE OF JAYAKRISNAN, FULL-TIME SANSKRIT TEACHER THAZHEKODE AUP SCHOOL, P.O.MUKKAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION (L) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014.
3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER MUKKAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT 673 602.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.A FAYAZ
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 9929 of 2016 (M)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL
// TRUE COPY //
P.A TO JUDGE
SB
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
===================== W.P.(C) No.9929 of 2016 - G
====================== Dated this the 15th day of March, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is aggrieved with the
non-consideration of Ext.P6 petition filed before the 1st respondent. The petition is filed on 17.02.2016.
will have to look at the petition filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
SB/15/03/2016
// true copy //
P.A to Judge.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 1st respondent is bound to consider the July 2014 petition filed by the petitioner before it.
P.K.JISHA
THE STATE OF KERALA
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS
THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
K VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
