Ansar v. Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge dismissed the writ petition as infructuous by a single paragraph order without substantive reasoning, noting the matter was finally heard on 13-06-2016.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/23RD JYAISHTA, 1938
WP(C).No. 9368 of 2011 (U)
PETITIONER(S):
ANSAR.K.A., S/O.ALIBABA, AGED 38 YEARS, KARIPPAKATTU HOUSE, KAKKANADU P.O.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.B.UNNIRAJ SMT.R.S.GEETHA SMT.SHYLA SHAFFEQ
RESPONDENT(S):
1. TAHSILDAR, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, PERUMBAVOOR-683542.
2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VAZHAKULAM VILLAGE, PERUMBAVOOR-683542.
3. HARSHAD HUSSAIN, S/O.MUHAMMED, AGED 39 YEARS, FATHIMA MANZIL, CHITTATTUKARA-680511..
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ANSAR.K.A.
- respondent
TAHSILDAR, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, PERUMBAVOOR
- respondent
THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VAZHAKULAM VILLAGE, PERUMBAVOOR
- respondent
HARSHAD HUSSAIN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court