Disposed

Smt. Valsa Thattil v. the Manager

Kerala HC29 Nov 2016WP(C)/7816/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mediation settlement reached on 23.9.2016 between petitioner and respondents; writ petition disposed of based on this agreement.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of in terms of the mediation agreement dated 23.9.2016.

What the court decided

AI extract

Smt. Valsa Thattil Vs the Manager — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2016)

¶21

EXHIBIT P1-	TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 29-11-2013 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2-	TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 09-12-2013 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P3-	TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 17-01-2014.
EXHIBIT P4-	TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 28-02-2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P5-	TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 03-04-2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P6-	TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT LIST SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 29-04-2014.
EXHIBIT P7-	TRUE COPY OF THE WITNESS LIST DATED 29-04-2014 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8-	TRUE COPY OF THE WITNESS LIST DATED 27-02-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P9-	TRUE COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22-04-2015.
EXHIBIT P10-	TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT M1 IN EXHIBIT P9, WHICH IS THE COMPLAINT DATED 27-11-2013 ALLEGEDLY SUBMITTED BY SMT. PRIYA CHACKO TO THE PRINCIPAL, HOLY ANGEL'S HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, OLLUR.
EXHIBIT P11-	TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT MARKED AS M2 IN EXHIBIT P9 WHICH IS THE INAUGURAL MEETING REPORT OF THE SCHOOL YUVAJANOLSAVAM DATED 08-10-2013 PREPARED BY THE PRINCIPAL HOLY ANGEL'S HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, OLLUR.

¶25

EXHIBIT P12-	TRUE COPY OF THE IN EXHIBIT P9 WHI DATED 09-10-2013 ANGEL'S HIGHER SE TO THE PRINCIPAL	DOCUMENT WHICH WAS MARKED AS M3 CH IS THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY C.E.TRAINERS, HOLY CONDARY SCHOOL, OLLUR SUBMITTED OF THE SCHOOL.
EXHIBIT P13-	TRUE COPY OF THE EXHIBIT P9 WHICH DATED 26-11-2013, THE PRINCIPAL, HO SCHOOL, OLLUR.	DOCUMENT MARKED AS M4 IN IS THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY SANDRA CHACKO TO LY ANGEL'S HIGHER SECONDARY
EXHIBIT P14-	TRUE COPY OF THE EXHIBIT P9 WHICH DATED 27-11-2013, OF HOLY ANGEL'S MANAGEMENT.	DOCUMENT MARKED AS M5 IN IS THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE STAFF MEMBERS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, TO THE
EXHIBIT P15-	TRUE COPY OF THE EXHIBIT P9 WHICH SUBMITTED BY THE THE MANAGER IN CO ACTION AGAINST TH	DOCUMENT MARKED AS M6 IN IS THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPORT ENQUIRY COMMISSION MEMBERS TO NNECTION WITH THE DISCIPLINARY E PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P16-	TRUE COPY OF THE (MW1) BEFORE THE EXHIBIT P9.	DEPOSITION OF SMT. PRIYA CHACKO 3RD RESPONDENT ANNEXED WITH
EXHIBIT P17-	TRUE COPY OF THE BEFORE THE 3RD RE P9.	DEPOSITION OF SRI. JITHIN (MW2) SPONDENT ANNEXED WITH EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT P18-	TRUE COPY OF THE SRI.ANTONY OLAKEN RESPONDENT ANNEXE	DEPOSITION OF GIL, (MW3) BEFORE THE 3RD D WITH EXHIBIT P9.
EXHIBIT P19-	TRUE COPY OF THE FILED BY THE PETI RESPONDENT.	AFFIDAVIT DATED 27-02-2015 TIONER BEFORE THE 3RD
EXHIBIT P20-	TRUE COPY OF THE (DW1) BEFORE THE EXHIBIT P9.	DEPOSITION OF THE PETITIONER, 3RD RESPONDENT ANNEXED WITH
EXHIBIT P21-	TRUE COPY OF THE P.K.JAYAMOHANA TH RESPONDENT ANNEXE	DEPOSITION OF ILAKAN (DW2) BEFORE THE 3RD D WITH EXHIBIT P9.
EXHIBIT P22-	TRUE COPY OF THE (DW3) BEFORE THE EXHIBIT P9.	DEPOSITION OF FRANKSON A.F. 3RD RESPONDENT ANNEXED WITH

¶29

EXHIBIT	P23-	TRUE COPY OF THE (DW4) BEFORE THE EXHIBIT P9.	DEPOSITION OF LIPEESH CHIRAYATH 3RD RESPONDENT ANNEXED WITH
EXHIBIT	P24-	TRUE COPY OF THE WHICH THE 1ST RES THE PETITIONER.	LETTER DATED 11-05-2015 BY PONDENT FORWARDED EXHIBIT P9 TO
EXHIBIT	P25-	TRUE COPY OF THE SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT IN RES	REPLY DATED 18-05-2015 PETITIONER TO THE 1ST PONSE TO EXHIBIT P24.
EXHIBIT	P26-	TRUE COPY OF THE BY THE 1ST RESPON FROM SERVICE.	ORDER DATED 22-05-2015 PASSED DENT DISMISSING THE PETITIONER
EXHIBIT	P27-	TRUE COPY OF THE RESPONDENT DATED SUBSISTENCE ALLOW	PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST 20-02-2015 SANCTIONING THE ANCE TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT	P28-	TRUE COPY OF THE DATED 27-06-2015 THE 4TH RESPONDEN	LETTER WITH NO.B6/5272/2014 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO T.
RESPOND -------	ENT(S)' -------	EXHIBITS: ---------	NIL

Smt. Valsa Thattil v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

C.H.Pravin Kumar & Others Vs the Cmid, Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.

Swapna Jacob Vs Management St.Mary'S High School & Other

Shaji.B Vs the Kerala State Financial Enterprises Ltd., Rep.by Its Managing Director

T.Ayissu Vs the State of Kerala

Smt. Valsa Thattil v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

C.H.Pravin Kumar & Others Vs the Cmid, Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.

Swapna Jacob Vs Management St.Mary'S High School & Other

Shaji.B Vs the Kerala State Financial Enterprises Ltd., Rep.by Its Managing Director

T.Ayissu Vs the State of Kerala

A compact analysis

Coram

M.Padmanabhan Namboothiri Vs State of Kerala

P.Sarathkumar Vs the Tdb