C.H.Pravin Kumar & Others v. the Cmid, Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging management trainee selection became infructuous due to respondent's assertion and lack of petitioner appearance; court closed the matter.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/7TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 497 of 2011 (J)
PETITIONER(S):
1. C.H.PRAVIN KUMAR, S/O.C.H.SATYA NARAYANAN RAO, H.NO.EWS-157, KHB COLONY, KUKATPALLY,
HYDERABAD-500 072. ANDHRA PRADESH, (THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY).
2. E.NARAYANA, S/O.E.VANNURAPPA, H.NO. 2-1-402/1, NALLKUNTA, HYDERABAD, ANDHRA PRADESH, (THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY)., BOTH REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, R.MURUGAIYAN, MALATHI NILAYAM, H.NO.XXII/236, OEN ROAD, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY SRI.R.MURUGAIYAN (PARTY-IN-PERSON)
RESPONDENT :
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.H.Pravin Kumar and E Narayana
- respondent
The CMD, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Coram
Anu Sivaraman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court