Disposed
S. Laithamma v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCWP(C)/75/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/14TH POUSHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 75 of 2016 (H)
PETITIONER(S):
S. LALITHAMMA, AGED 52 YEARS W/O.SURESHKUMAR, HEADMISTRESS HINDU UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, ERAMALLIKKARA, CHENGANNOOR ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, RESIDING AT GOURI MADHAVAM HOUSE NO.113, ASRAMAM NAGAR, ASRAMAM (PO) ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.THAMBAN
SRI.R.REJI SMT.THARA THAMBAN SMT.K.G.SAROJINI SRI.B.BIPIN SRI.ARUN BOSE
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695 001.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION) ALAPPUZHA.
4. THE MANAGER (SECRETARY) TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD SCHOOL NANDANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 75 of 2016 (H)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 14-12-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DPI
DT 14-12-2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL
// TRUE COPY //
P. A TO JUDGE
SB
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
===================== W.P.(C) No.75 of 2016 - H
======================
Dated this the 04th day of January, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is aggrieved with the
non-consideration of Ext.P1 representation filed before the 2nd
respondent. The representation is filed on 14.12.2015.
will have to look at the representation filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the Manager and the petitioner, at any rate within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 2nd respondent will consider, in accordance with law.
The writ petition is disposed of.
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
SB/04/01/2016 // true copy // P.A to Judge.
S. LALITHAMMA
STATE OF KERALA
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court