K.Gopinathan v. Pension Board
Case brief
What is this about?
Retired employee's writ petition claiming non-payment of pension despite remitted contributions by bank. Court noted Board sanctioned proportionate pension. No further relief required; petition closed.
What did the court decide?
None; court found no further relief required as pension proportionate to remitted funds was already sanctioned by the Board.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/16TH JYAISHTA, 1938
WP(C).No. 7141 of 2011 (P)
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
K.GOPINATHAN, RETIRED SECRETARY, PURATHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, P.O.PURATHUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT KUNNATH HOUSE, PURATHUR, THIRUR THALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.N.MOHANAN SMT.I.VINAYAKUMARI
RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE EMPLOYEES', PENSION BOARD, KALA NIVAS, T.C.27/156, 157, NEAR AYURVEDA COLLEGE, KUNNUMPURAM, P.B.NO.85, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. PH: 0471 - 2475681.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to proportionate pension and declaration of entitlement from 1.1.2009.
Whether further relief is required given Board's sanction of proportionate pension.
Validity of cooperative banking employees' pension scheme contribution remittance timing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Gopinathan
- respondent
Kerala State Co-operative Employees' Pension Board
- respondent
Purathur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court