Disposed

Jyothi Joy v. Mahatma Gandhi University

Kerala HC14 Jan 2016WP(C)/573/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Writ Petition (Civil) No. 573 of 2016 filed by multiple students sought revaluation of their examination answer scripts. The University stated that the revaluation process was underway and would be completed by 01.03.2016. The Court disposed of the writ petition by recording the University's submission, without issuing any specific interim order or allowing the petition on merits in this orde

What the court decided

AI extract

Jyothi Joy Vs Mahatma Gandhi University — Education and Admissions | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/24TH POUSHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 573 of 2016 (V)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

1. JYOTHI JOY CHIRAYIL HOUSE, PAMPADUMPARA P.O. IDUKKI DISTRICT.

¶8

2. MEERA JOSE ARINJANIYIL HOUSE, VAZHITHALA P.O. THODUPUZHA.

¶9

3. AMBILI JOHN PULICKAL HOUSE, EAST KALLOOR P.O., THODUPUZHA.

¶10

4. ABITHA JOSEPH CHERUPARAMBIL HOUSE VAZHAKULAM P.O. MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK.

¶11

5. REMYA MATHEW EATTU HOUSE, ERATTUPETTA P.O. PIN - 686 121.

¶12

6. MERIN SEBAN

¶13

VITHAYATHIL HOUSE, PUTHUPPARIYARAM P.O.THODUPUZHA IDUKKI.

¶14

7. SHERIN VAGHESE VETTERMURIYIL, THULAPPALLY P.O. PIN 686 510.

¶15

BY ADV. SRI.T.J.MICHAEL

¶16

WP(C).No. 573 of 2016 (V)

¶17

RESPONDENTS:

¶18

1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY KOTTAYAM REP. BY THE REGISTRAR ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O.KOTTAYAM - 686 560.

¶19

2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O. KOTTAYAM - 686 560.

¶20

BY SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶22

WP(C).No. 573 of 2016 (V)

¶23

APPENDIX

¶24

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶25

EXT.P-1:	COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF IST PETITIONER DATED 14.12.2015
EXT.P-2:	CHELLAN RECEIPT EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF FEES DATED 15.12.2015
EXT.P-3:	TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE FIRST PETITIONER
EXT.P-4:	TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF REVALUATION APPLICATION OF 2ND PETITIONER DATED 14.12.2015
EXT.P-5:	TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT OF FEES FOR REVALUATION DATED 15.12.2015
EXT.P-6:	TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE SECOND PETITIONER DATED NIL
EXT.P-7:	TRUE COPY OF REVALUATION APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE THIRD PETITIONER DATED 14.12.2015
EXT.P-8:	TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT OF FEES FOR REVALUATION DATED 15.12.2015
EXT.P-9:	TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE PETITIONER
EXT.P-10:	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER DATED 15.12.2015
EXT.P-11:	TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT OF FEES FOR REVALUATION OF THE FOURTH PETITIONER DATED 15.12.2014
EXT.P-12:	TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE 4TH PETITIONER
EXT.P-13:	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE FIFTH PETITIONER DATED 14.12.2015
EXT.P-14:	TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT OF FEES FOR REVALUATION REMITTED BY THE FIFTH PETITIONER DATED 15.12.2015
EXT.P-15:	TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF 4TH PETITIONER
EXT.P-16:	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE SIXTH PETITIONER DATED 14.12.2015

¶26

WP(C).No. 573 of 2016 (V)

¶27

EXT.P-17: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPTS FOR PAYMENT OF FEES FOR REVALUATION DATED 15.12.2015

¶28

EXT.P-18: TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE SIXTH PETITIONER

¶29

EXT.P-19: TRUE COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE SEVENTH PETITIONER DATED 14.12.2015

¶30

EXT.P-20: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPTS FOR PAYMENT OF FEES FOR REVALUATION DATED 15.12.2015

¶31

EXT.P-21: A TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE SEVENTH PETITIONER

¶32

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS :- NIL

/TRUE COPY/

P.A. TO JUDGE.

DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J

¶37

W.P.(C.) NO. 573 OF 2016

¶38

Dated this the 14^th day of January, 2016

¶39

JUDGMENT

¶40

The petitioners seek revaluation of their answer scripts. The University submits that the process is on and

¶41

that the same would be completed by 01.03.2016.

¶42

The writ petition is disposed of recording the submission on behalf of the University.

¶43

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE

¶44

DCS

Jyothi Joy v. Mahatma Gandhi University

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Jyothi Joy v. Mahatma Gandhi University

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Francis Vs Lailamma Abraham

Shali Vs Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd.

Nishad.K.C. Vs the Regional Transport Officer

Anoop Kumar T.M Vs Koovappady Grama Panchayat

M.G Pradeepkumar Vs Sri.Antony Chacko

P.Sreekala Vs the Secretary