Petitioner sought vehicle replacement for transport service. Court directed respondent to consider application with notice within three weeks and disposed of the writ petition.
Direction to respondent to consider petitioner’s application with notice within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/23RD MAGHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 5193 of 2016 (Y)
PETITIONER:
SOMI JOSEPH, S/O.MATHAI JOSEPH, KAIPPADAKUNNEL HOUSE, YENDAYAR P.O. KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENT:
THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM-686 002.
BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 5193 of 2016 (Y)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT OF KL-34-C-4797 EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REPLACEMENT DATED 9/2/2016 WITH COVERING LETTER
EXT.P3. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.8044/2015 DATED 13/3/2015.
RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS :- NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE.
DCS
V. CHITAMBARESH, J
W.P.(C). NO. 5193 OF 2016
Dated this the 12th day of February, 2016
JUDGMENT
The petitioner points out that the vehicle can be replaced by an older vehicle to operate service on the route. Reliance is placed on Ext.P3 judgment in W.P.(C). No. 8044/2015.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE
DCS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Transport Authority is directed to consider the petitioner’s application for vehicle replacement with notice.
Whether the writ petition can be disposed of after issuing a direction to the respondent.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
not specified in textReferred¶26
W.P.(C). No. 8044/2015
SOMI JOSEPH
THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM
V. CHITAMBARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
