K.K.Vinod v. Muralikrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a contempt of court case where the court observed that directions of a previous judgment were complied with and the matter was closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/22ND MAGHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1901 of 2015 (S) IN W.P.(C). NO. 31077/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C.) NO.31077/2015 DATED 20.10.2015
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE W.P[C]:
K.K.VINOD AGED 38 YEARS S/O.KOCHAPPU, KODIYAN HOUSE, MARIYAPURAM THRISSUR, REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY JOHAR A.A AINIKKAL HOUSE, CHERPU.P.O., THRISSUR PIN-680 561.
BY ADV. SRI.M.JITHESH MENON
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:
MURALIKRISHNAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR - 680 562
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.K.VINOD
- respondent
MURALIKRISHNAN
Coram
V. CHITAMBARESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court