On 15-01-2016, a three-judge bench dismissed the writ petition filed by two women as not pressed, recording the counsel's submission to that effect without engaging with the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/25TH POUSHA, 1937
W.P.(C).No.5074 of 2007 (D)
PETITIONER(S):-
BY ADVS.SRI.N.K.POULOSEKUTTY.
RESPONDENT(S):-
R1, R2 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE. R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. Vinod Chandran, J
-------------------------------------W.P.(C).No.5074 of 2007-D
Dated this the 15th day of January, 2016
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
vku/-
[ true copy ]
Meenakshikuttty M.
Ajitha P.T.
Child Development Project Officer (CDPO) ICDS Project Office, Mankada
District Social Welfare Officer
The Secretary, Pulamanthol Grama Panchayath
Director, Social Welfare Department
K.Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
