Leena A.S. v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The court directed the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within two months, affording an opportunity of hearing, without deciding the merits.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the 4th respondent to consider the representation within two months after affording an opportunity of hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/20TH MAGHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 4924 of 2016 (M)
PETITIONER:
LEENA A.S.
WORKER, WARD NO.VII, AMMANOORKONAM PALLICHAL PANCHAYATH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT RESIDING AT KADAYARA PUTHEN VEEDU, MUKKAMPALAMOODU NARUVAMOODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY
SMT.K.R.RIJA
RESPONDENTS:
1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAURAM-695001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Leena A.S.
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
The State Director Child Development Project (ICDS) Thiruvananthapuram
- respondent
The District Social Welfare Officer Thiruvananthapuram
- respondent
The Block Project Officer Child Development Project (ICDS)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court