Disposed

Sreejith A.S v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC8 Feb 2016WP(C)/1663/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the Court directed the First Respondent to consider and dispose of the Petitioner's pending revision petition within three months, without commenting on the merits of the underlying case.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the First Respondent to consider and dispose of the revision petition within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Sreejith A.S Vs State of Kerala — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

¶4

MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/19TH MAGHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 1663 of 2016 (G)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

SREEJITH A.S., AGED 32 YEARS AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.A.P.SANKUNNY NAMBISSAN AREEKKARA HOUSE, VELLATTANJOOR, VELUR (PO) THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 601.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶11

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶12

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION THRISSUR-680 001.

¶13

4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER VADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR-680 582.

¶14

5. THE MANAGER

¶15

DVLP HIGH SCHOOL, MUNDATHICODE, THRISSUR-680 623.

¶16

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A LOWSY

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

WP(C).No. 1663 of 2016 (G)

¶19

APPENDIX

¶20

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :-

¶21

EXT.P1	- COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 02.08.2008.
EXT.P2	- COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01.06.2009.
EXT.P3	- COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER
	BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 05.01.2016.

¶22

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

¶27

---------------------------------W.P(C). No.1663 of 2016-G

¶28

---------------------------------Dated this the 8^th day of February, 2016.

¶29

JUDGMENT

¶30

The petitioner is aggrieved with the nonconsideration of Ext.P3 revision petition pending before the first respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 within a reasonable period.

¶31

In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 revision petition of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made

¶32

W.P(C). No.1663 of 2016-G

¶33

¶34

any observation on merits, which the first respondent will consider in accordance with law.

¶35

The writ petition is disposed of.

¶36

Sd/-

¶37

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.

¶38

//True Copy//

¶39

P.A. to Judge.

¶40

sp/08/02/16

Sreejith A.S v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sreejith A.S v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Thrivikraman Namboothiri Vs v.S.Jayakumar

Binoy Mathew Vs the K.P.S.C.

P.K.Mohandas Vs State of Kerala

R. Jayasankar Vs the Kerala Financial Corporation.

K.U. Mini Vs Kerala Water Authority

A.T.Ramachandran Vs the Secretary to Government of India