Allowed

Abdul Rahman v. the District Collector

Kerala HC19 Feb 2016WP(C)/4592/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged the undue delay by the District Collector in processing an application for an NOC required for an explosive license. The Court directed the Collector to consider the application within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the District Collector to consider the application for the NOC within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Abdul Rahman Vs the District Collector — RTI and Transparency | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/30TH MAGHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 4592 of 2016 (Y)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

ABDUL RAHMAN, S/O.C.H.ABDULLA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BEDISON, MAHAL, R.D.NAGAR, KASARGODE DISTRICT.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.B.N.SHIVSANKAR

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KASARGOD, KERALA, PIN - 671 121.

¶11

2. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, KASARGODE AT KANHANGAD , PIN - 671 121.

¶12

3. THE SUB COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD AT KANHANGAD, COLLECTORATE, KASARGODE, KERALA, PIN - 671 121.

¶13

4. THE DIVISIONAL OFFICER FIRE & RESCUE SERVICES, NATIONAL HIGHWAY 17, MEENCHANDA, KOZHIKODE - 673 018, NEAR ARTS COLLEGE, KOZHIKODE.

¶14

5. THE SECRETARY, KASARGODE MUNICIPALITY, KASARAGODE PO, PIN - 671 121.

¶15

6. THE GENERAL MANAGER, DISTRICT INDIUSTRIAL CENTRE, CIVIL STATOIN, VIDYANAGAR, KASARGODE - 670 123.

¶16

R1 TO R4 & R6 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

mbr/

¶19

WP(C).No. 4592 of 2016 (Y)

¶20

APPENDIX

¶21

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

¶22

P1TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 20.1.2015.

¶23

P2TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION MADE BY THE COLLECTOR TO THE OTHER RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6 DATED 3.2.2015.

¶24

P3TRUE COPY OF NOC ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6 DATED 28.3.2015, 22.5.2015, 11.2.2015 & 3.3.2015.

¶25

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.S. TO JUDGE

mbr/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

¶31

===================

¶32

W.P.(C). No. 4592 OF 2016

¶33

======================= Dated this the 19^th day of February, 2016

¶34

JUDGMENT

¶35

The petitioner approached the District Collector,

¶36

Kasaragod for issuance of NOC for the purpose of explosive license. The petitioner approached this Court alleging undue delay in considering the application.

¶37

Considering the facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the District Collector to consider the application within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

¶38

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶39

Sd/A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE

¶40

SKV

Abdul Rahman v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Rahman v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.S.Nazar Vs Sri.G.Prasad

Deputy Director of Collegiate Education Vs Dr.Malathy

The Principal Chief Forest Conservator (Wild Life)& Chief Wild Life Warden Vs C.S.Nazar

M.K.Rajappan Vs the General Manager, Southern Railway, Thiruvananthapuram.

Alphonsa.P Vs the Director

K.K.Shaji Vs the Tahsildar, Sulthanbatheri