C.S.Nazar v. Sri.G.Prasad
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed a contempt of court case in view of directions issued in a separate review petition, delivering only a one-line order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/29TH MAGHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 59 of 2016 (S)
-----------------------------------------THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.35620/2015 DATED 25-11-2015.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
C.S. NAZAR, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.SAIDU KUNJU, CHOORAVELIL HOUSE, ADIMALY P.O., IDUKKI - 685 561.
BY SRI.K.JAJU BABU, SENIOR ADVOCATE. ADV. SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI.
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
SRI.G. PRASAD, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WILD LIFE WARDEN, MUNNAR DIVISION, MUNNAR, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685 612.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.S. NAZAR
- respondent
SRI.G. PRASAD
Coram
A.MUHAMMED MUSTAQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court