Harikrishnan.K. v. District Tourism Promotion Council and a
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/14TH PHALGUNA, 1937
WP(C).No. 4549 of 2011 (P)
PETITIONER:
HARIKRISHNAN.K., KRISHNAMANGALAM HOUSE, THALAYOLAPARAMBU VAIKOM-686 605, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ
RESPONDENT:
1. DISTRICT TOURISM PROMOTION COUNCIL, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY DISTRICT TOURISM PROMOTION COUNCIL, BOAT JETTY ROAD ALAPPUZHA-688 001.
2. THE SECRETARY, DISTRICT TOURISM PROMOTION COUNCIL, BOAT JETTY ROAD ALAPPUZHA-688 001.
R,R1&2 BY ADV. SRI.R.AZAD BABU
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RKC
P.V.ASHA, J.
W.P.(C) No.4549 of 2011
Dated this the 4th day of March, 2016
JUDGMENT
The original petition was filed challenging Ext.P3 order by which the petitioner was directed to pay back a sum of Rs.1,70,700/- (Rupees One lakh seventy thousand seven hundred only) along with interest towards the salary received by him on his appointment as per Ext.P1. Respondents 1 and 2 have filed a counter affidavit, stating that, the executive committee of the first respondent held on 11.3.2011 has decided not to recover the salary paid to the petitioner. In view of the above stand adopted by respondents 1 and 2, no orders are necessary in this writ petition. The writ petition is closed recording the statement made by the respondents.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA JUDGE
rkc
TRUE COPY
PA TO JUDGE
HARIKRISHNAN.K.
DISTRICT TOURISM PROMOTION COUNCIL
THE SECRETARY, DISTRICT TOURISM PROMOTION COUNCIL
P.V.ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court