Benoy M.Jacob v. Secretary to Govt
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed the writ petition for default because the petitioner and counsel were absent when the petition was finally heard.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2012/13TH ASHADHA 1934
WP(C).No. 16760 of 2007 (T)
PETITIONER(S):
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.ELIAS
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM.
4. THE MANAGER,
5. M.V.MATHEW,
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
VK
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
------------------------------------------W.P.(C) No.16760 of 2007
---------------------------------------------Dated this the 4th day of July, 2012
JUDGMENT
Petitioner and counsel are absent. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default.
S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
acd
BENOY M.JACOB
THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM
THE MANAGER, ST.MARY'S HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL
M.V.MATHEW
S.SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court