Disposed

Shamnad a v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC3 Feb 2016WP(C)/4172/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala directed the first respondent (State of Kerala) to consider a pending appeal filed by the petitioner and hearing the concerned manager within three months, disposing of the writ petition without passing remarks on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 1st respondent to consider the appeal, after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, within three months.

Shamnad a Vs State of Kerala — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/14TH MAGHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 4172 of 2016 (V)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

SHAMNAD A AGED 31 YEARS, PART TIME L.G.(URDU) UPSA IGMVHSS, MANJAKKALA, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT RESIDING AT KURANTHARA PUTHEN VEEDU, KARALIKONAM, ARKANNOOR P.O., KOLLAM 691533

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.S.SHAJI

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

¶11

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 014.

¶12

3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT 691 001.

¶13

4. THE HEADMISTRESS, IGMVHSS, MANJAKKALA, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM 691 508.

¶14

5. THE MANAGER, IGMVHSS, MANJAKKALA, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM 691 508.

¶15

R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE

¶16

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

WP(C).No. 4172 of 2016 (V)

¶18

APPENDIX

¶19

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶20

P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 20.07.2006 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT

¶21

P2: TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P) NO.10/10 G. EDN DATED 12.01.2010

¶22

P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ONE DAY VERIFICATION REPORT DATED 12.07.2006 OF THE IGMVHSS, MANJAKKALA

¶23

P4: TRUE COPY OF THE HIGHER LEVEL VERIFICATION REPORT DATED 23.11.2006 OF THE IGMVHSS, MANJAKKALA CONDUCTED BY THE D.D.E. KOLLAM

¶24

P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20.08.2015 BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT

¶25

P6: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.9.2015 IN WPC NO.27855/2015

¶26

P7: TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO. 5494/2015 G. EDN. DATED 21.11.2015

¶27

P8: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.2.2015 IN WPC 29764/2012

¶28

P9: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.2.2015 IN WPC 24953/2009

¶29

P10: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 01.01.2016 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT

¶30

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

¶36

W.P.(C) No. 4172 of 2016 (V)

¶37

Dated this the 3^rd day of February, 2016

¶38

J U D G M E N T

¶39

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P10 appeal dated 01.01.2016 has not been considered till date by the 1^st respondent.

¶40

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1^st respondent to consider the appeal, in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

¶41

The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1^st respondent.

¶42

Sd/K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE

¶43

jjj 3/2/16

Shamnad a v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shamnad a v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.N.Purushothaman Vs Chandini P.

Fazil Bappu Vs University of Calicut

R.K.Madhusoodhanan Unnithan Vs Union of India

M.G. Sankaranarayanan Potti Vs the Travancore Devaswom Board

Greeshma Peter Vs State of Kerala

M.Shyni Vs State of Kerala