C.S Madhu v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court directed the Respondent, R.T.A., to consider the Petitioner's representation for a permit-less certificate within two weeks and not insist on the surrender of the regular permit previously held by the Petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Respondent to consider the application for a permit-less certificate within two weeks without insisting on the surrender of the regular permit.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/16TH MAGHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 3673 of 2016 (H)
PETITIONER:
C.S MADHU, AGED 43 YEARS CHEERAKOMPIL HOUSE, VENGALLOORE P O, THODUPUZHA
BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK
RESPONDENT:
THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI - 685 603
BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the R.T.A. should consider the petitioner's request for a permit-less certificate without insisting on the surrender of the regular permit.
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of urgently.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.S. Madhu
- respondent
The Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Idukki
Coram
V. Chitambaresh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court