P.Jayakumar v. Antony Chacko
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt of court case regarding the compliance of directions in a prior judgment. The court held that the petitioner had complied with the directions and closed the contempt proceedings on the merits.
What did the court decide?
The contempt of court case is closed as the petitioner complied with the directions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/15TH MAGHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 115 of 2016 (S) IN W.P.(C). NO.37240/2015
---------------------------------------------------------------------------JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C). NO. 37240/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 17.12.2015
PETITIONER:
P.JAYAKUMAR, AGED 66 YEARS PAYYERI HOUSE, COCHIN, UNIVERSITY.P.O 682022, KALAMASSERY. (SUPERINTENDENT RTD KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ALUVA UNIT).
BY ADV. SRI.R.SANTHOSH BABU
RESPONDENT:
ANTONY CHACKO (AGE AND DATE OF BIRTH AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER). THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRANSPORT BHAAVAN, TRIVANDRUM-695001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.JAYAKUMAR
- respondent
ANTONY CHACKO
Coram
V. CHITAMBARESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court