The Kerala High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by V.P. Muhammedkunhi Haji against the Calicut Corporation as infructuous upon hearing the matter on 17-03-2016.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/27TH PHALGUNA, 1937
WP(C).No. 35052 of 2004 (W)
PETITIONER(S):
V.P. MUHAMMEDKUNHI HAJI, N.P. HOUSE, P.O. NELLIKKAPARAMBU,, MUKKAM, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS
RESPONDENT(S):
1. CALICUT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, CALICUT BEACH P.O., CALICUT.
2. THE TOWN SURVEYOR, CALICUT CORPORATION, CALICUT.
RESPONDENTS BY ADV. SRI.C.M.SURESH BABU, SC,KOZHIKODE CORPN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
W.P(C).No. 35052 of 2004
Dated this the 17th March, 2016
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition
has become infructuous. This submission is recorded and the writ
petition is dismissed as infructuous.
ANU SIVARAMAN
JUDGE
vgs18/3
V.P. Muhammedkunhi Haji
Calicut Corporation
The Town Surveyor
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
