Aneesh v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Short order directing the RTO to consider petitioner's application for vehicle replacement based on roadworthiness, not model, within three weeks.
What did the court decide?
Direction to consider replacement application and decide within three weeks based on roadworthiness and viability.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/15TH BHADRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 29453 of 2016 (F)
PETITIONER(S):
ANEESH
S/O. ASHARAF, CHIRAMURIKKAL, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, (RTO) ALAPPUZHA- 688 001.
2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY- 688 001.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to direction for replacement of an inferior model vehicle.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aneesh
- respondent
The Secretary Regional Transport Authority Cum Regional Transport Officer, Alappuzha
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court