Disposed

Sruthina N v. M.G.University, Rep. by Vice Chancellor

Kerala HC2 Feb 2016WP(C)/2900/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners approached the Kerala High Court under Article 226 seeking revaluation of their answer scripts. The University submitted that the revaluation process was ongoing and results would be published by March 16, 2016. The Court approved the submission and disposed of the petition without further directions.

What did the court decide?

Nil; no directions given beyond accepting University's submission.

Sruthina N Vs M.G.University, Rep. by Vice Chancellor — Education and Admissions | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

¶4

SATURDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/13TH MAGHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 2900 of 2016 (J)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

SRUTHINA N AGED 25 YEARS

¶8

D/O.RAMESHAN, UTHRADAM HOUSE, MUZHAPPALA P.O.

¶9

KANNUR-670 611.

¶10

JYOTHI S SANKER NJARAVILAYIL HOUSE, THENGAMAM P.O, . PIN-690 522.

¶11

RESHMA JOSEPH KUMPUKAL HOUSE, CHATHANTHARA P.O, PIN-686 510.

¶12

REVATHY SASIDHARAN THACHETHE HOUSE, MANAKKAD P.O., THODUPUZHA PIN-685 608.

¶13

ATHIRA T.N. THEKKAPARIYATH HOUSE, KOODAPPULAM P.O. RAMAPURAM-686 576.

¶14

SHARON THOMAS

¶15

KALAPPURAYIL HOUSE, KALLANODE.

¶16

SOJA SABU CHAMAPPARA HOUSE, MUNDAKAYAM P.O., MUNDAKAYAM-686 513.

¶17

AMALA KURIAKOSE AZHIKANNICKAL HOSUE, CHITTARIKKAL P.O. KANNUR-671 326.

¶18

ANJALY MOHANAN

¶19

ELEVANKUZHY HOUSE, MULAKULAM, PIRAVAM-686 664.

¶20

ANSUMOL CHERIAN

¶21

PADANILATHIL HOUSE, CHITTADI P.O., CHITTADI-686 512.

¶22

ANUPAMA HARIDAS

¶23

KANJILIL HOUSE , NELLANKARA P.O., NETTISSERY-680 561.

¶24

BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH

¶25

RESPONDENT(S):

¶26

M.G.UNIVERSITY

¶27

REPRESENTED BY VICE CHANCELLOR, KOTTAYAM.686 560

¶28

R BY SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY

¶29

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶30

WP(C).No. 2900 of 2016 (J)

¶31

APPENDIX

¶32

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶33

EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF	THE MARK LIST OF TH	E 1ST PETITIONE	R
EXT.P1(A). TRUE COPY	OF THE MARK LIST OF	THE 2ND PETIT	IONER
EXT.P1(B). TRUE COPY	OF THE MARK LIST OF	THE 3RD PETIT	IONER
EXT.P1(C). TRUE COPY	OF THE MARK LIST OF	THE 4TH PETIT	IONER
EXT.P1(D). TRUE COPY	OF THE MARK LIST OF	THE 5TH PETIT	IONER
EXT.P1(E). TRUE COPY	OF THE MARK LIST OF	THE 6TH PETIT	IONER
EXT.P1(F). TRUE COPY	OF THE MARK LIST OF	THE 7TH PETIT	IONER
EXT.P1(G). TRUE COPY	OF THE MARK LIST OF	THE 8TH PETIT	IONER
EXT.P1(H). TRUE COPY	OF THE MARK LIST OF	THE 9TH PETIT	IONER
EXT.P1(I). TRUE COPY	OF THE MARK LIST OF	THE 10TH PETI	TIONER
EXT.P1(J). TRUE COPY	OF THE MARK LIST OF	THE 11TH PETI	TIONER
EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF	THE APPLICATION FOR	REVALUATION OF	THE 1ST
PETITIONER DATED 8/	1/2016.
EXT.P2(A). TRUE COPY	OF THE APPLICATION	FOR REVALUATION	OF THE 2ND
PETITIONER DATED 8/	1/2016.
EXT.P2(B). TRUE COPY PETITIONER DATED 8/	OF THE APPLICATION 1/2016.	FOR REVALUATION	OF THE 3RD
EXT.P2(C). TRUE COPY PETITIONER DATED 8/	OF THE APPLICATION 1/2016.	FOR REVALUATION	OF THE 4TH
EXT.P2(D). TRUE COPY	OF THE APPLICATION	FOR REVALUATION	OF THE 5TH
PETITIONER DATED 8/	1/2016.
EXT.P2(E). TRUE COPY PETITIONER DATED 8/	OF THE APPLICATION 1/2016.	FOR REVALUATION	OF THE 6TH
EXT.P2(F). TRUE COPY	OF THE APPLICATION	FOR REVALUATION	OF THE 7TH
PETITIONER DATED 8/	1/2016.
EXT.P2(G). TRUE COPY	OF THE APPLICATION	FOR REVALUATION	OF THE 8TH
PETITIONER DATED 8/	1/2016.
EXT.P2(H). TRUE COPY	OF THE APPLICATION	FOR REVALUATION	OF THE 9TH
PETITIONER DATED 8/	1/2016.
EXT.P2(I). TRUE COPY	OF THE APPLICATION	FOR REVALUATION	OF THE 10TH
PETITIONER DATED 8/	1/2016.
EXT.P2(J). TRUE COPY PETITIONER DATED 8/	OF THE APPLICATION 1/2016.	FOR REVALUATION	OF THE 11TH

¶34

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS

¶35

--------------------------------------NIL

TRUE COPY

SKS

P.A TO JUDGE

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

¶40

W.P (C)NO. 2900 OF 2016

¶41

Dated this the 2^nd day of February, 2016

¶42

JUDGMENT

¶43

The petitioners seek revaluation of their answer scripts.

¶44

The University submits that the process of the revaluation is

¶45

on. And that the result would be published by 16.3.2016.

¶46

The submission of the University is hereby

¶47

recorded. No further directions are warranted in this writ

¶48

petition.

¶49

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

¶50

V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE

¶51

sks

Sruthina N v. M.G.University, Rep. by Vice Chancellor

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sruthina N v. M.G.University, Rep. by Vice Chancellor

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alex Itticheriya Vs M.G.Rajamanickam

Mohammedkutty Vs Thirunavaya Grama Panchayath

M.v.Aneesh Vs the Rta, Wayanad

Jolly P.Antony Vs Sivasankar IAS

Girish G Krishnan Vs the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

Suneer Vs Ulliyeri Grama Panchayath