Achutha Kumar K.V v. Indusind Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed against a bank was dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel for the petitioners stated the matter was settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/10TH BHADRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 25775 of 2016 (V)
PETITIONER(S):
1. ACHUTHA KUMAR K.V, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.T.V.S.WARRIER, SANTHI LANE, THOTTAKKATTUKARA, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM-683108.
2. MRIDULA, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O.ACHUTHA KUMAR K.V., SANTHI LANE, THOTTAKKATTUKARA, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM-683108.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.K.RAJESHKUMAR KUM.APARNA SOMARAJAN SRI.P.KRISHNANKUTTY NAIR (KOLLAMALA)
RESPONDENT(S):
1.INDUSIND BANK LIMITED, CSEZ ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, CSEZ P.O., KAKKANAD, KOCHI-682037, (REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH HEAD DEVI C.MENON).
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-09-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
W.P.(C).No.25775 of 2016
----------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of September, 2016
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue relating to the above writ petition has already been settled. Therefore, the petitioners does not intend to proceed with the writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.
AV
/True Copy/
P.A to Judge
ACHUTHA KUMAR K.V, MRIDULA
INDUSIND BANK LIMITED, PEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PVT LTD
A.M.SHAFFIQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court