Roshini C.B. v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed this writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the orders passed by the appellate authority. This was a one-line order with no substantive reasoning.
The High Court dismissed this writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the orders passed by the appellate authority. This was a one-line order with no substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST 2016/9TH BHADRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 6597 of 2016 (Y)
PETITIONER(S) :
1. ROSHINI C.B., AGED 40 YEARS, W/O.CHANDRA BABU, MANAGING PARTNER, THE GREEN CONCEPT, SREE LEKSHMI, ORIENT NAGAR 72, PATTATHANAM, KOLLAM 691 021.
2. RAVIENDRAN D., AGED 65 YEARS,
S/O. DINAKARAN, PARTNER, THE GREEN CONCEPT, 3RD MILY STONE, KOLLAM 691 004.
BY ADV. SRI.R.KISHORE (KALLUMTHAZHAM)
RESPONDENT(S) :
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF URBAN AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM, PIN 691 001.
3. THAHSILDAR
KOLLAM DISTRICT, KOLLAM, PIN 691 001.
4. KOLLAM CORPORATION , REP BY SECRETARY, KOLLAM 691 001.
5. DILEEP, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.SURENDRAN, TEMPLE VIEW, MOONAMKUTTY, KILIKOLLOOR P.O, KOLLAM 691 004.
R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. LILLY.K.T. R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHAN DAS, S.C
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
=============== W.P. (C) No. 6597 of 2016
==================
Dated this, the 31st day of August, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the orders passed by the appellate authority.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the orders passed by the appellate authority.
Sd/-
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE
Rp31/08/2016
//True Copy//
P.S to Judge
ROSHINI C.B.
RAVIENDRAN D.
STATE OF KERALA
DILEEP
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court