The petitioner's writ petition was treated as withdrawn after the counsel stated that the petitioner had already approached the Government via an appeal, despite the counsel's request to prosecute the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/3RD ASHADHA, 1938
WP(C).No. 2155 of 2007 (F)
PETITIONER:
MANROTHURRUTHU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MANROTHURUTH, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) SRI.P.SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BOBBY JOHN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
==================
W.P.(C) No.2155 of 2007
==================
Dated this the 24th day of June, 2016 J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had already approached the Government by filing an appeal and he may be permitted to prosecute the said matter.
Without prejudice to the above right, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
A.M.Shaffique, Judge
al/-
True copy
P.S to Judge
Manrothurruthu Grama Panchayath
Kerala State Electricity Board
The Assistant Engineer, Electrical Section, East Kallada
Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Thiruvananthapuram
A.M. Shaiffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
