The petitioner challenged the service conditions or benefits of the Kerala Headload Workers Welfare Board. The court held that the writ petition had become infructuous and accordingly dismissed it without substantive analysis of the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/15TH ASWINA, 1938
WP(C).No. 18544 of 2006 (G)
PETITIONER(S):
SHOUKATH HUSSAIN, HEAD CLERK, KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, KASARAGOD.
BY ADV. SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE, KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD,, ERNAKULAM.
2. KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE
3. M.M. SOUD, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT LOCAL COMMITTEE TIRUR OF HEADLOAD WORKERS, WELFARE BOARD.
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPPADATH, SC, BY ADV. SRI.RENIL ANTO KANDAMKULATHY,SC, BY ADV. SRI.KOSHY GEORGE, SC,
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-10-2016,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
P.V.ASHA J.
-------------------------------------------W.P.(C) No.18544 of 2006
--------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
AS
SHOUKATH HUSSAIN
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE, KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD
KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD
M.M. SOUD
P.V. ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
