Roy Joseph v. Ipe Joseph
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. The judgment is a one-line order disposing of the matter without detailed reasoning or legal propositions suitable for citation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/13TH ASWINA, 1938
WP(C).No. 3158 of 2008 (A)
PETITIONER(S):
ROY JOSEPH, S/O.AUGUSTHY, KALAPURAYIL HOUSE, KALLOORKAD KARA AND VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI
RESPONDENT(S):
1. IPE JOSEPH, VAZHAKUDI HOUSE, NAGAPUZHA KARA, KALLOORKAD VILLAGE.
2. JILSMON JOHN, MADATHIL VEEDU, VALIYAPARA QUARRY, MANARKKAD, KALLOORKAD VILLAGE AND KARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
3. STEPHEN PACHIKARA, VALIPAYARA QUARRY, MANARKKAD, KALLOORKAD VILLAGE AND KARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ROY JOSEPH
- respondent
IPE JOSEPH
- respondent
JILSMON JOHN
- respondent
STEPHEN PACHIKARA
- respondent
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court